Hell No, Homeowners Won’t Go

Posted on 09 July 2008

It’s a doggy dog world in the real estate business. As more homeowners find themselves in hot water, according to Frank Ingrassia, an attorney who has recently filed roughly 70 suits against a variety of home lenders, “It’s an industry-wide problem.

“Some of the clients tried to do workouts and weren’t able to do that, and when you are faced with foreclosure, it’s an issue of striking first or not.

Litigation is a new approach for dealing with unprecedented levels of foreclosures,” added Ingrassia.
As featured in Law.com, the story centers on Denise Bennett, a woman who recently discovered that her “7.6 percent fixed-rate mortgage” with Countrywide Home Loans was anything but 7.6%, which they originally promised. Blindly scheduled to adjust in November from $1,400 to $1,700, Bennett is fighting back. Suing her lender on June 26 alleging fraud, the case is assigned to U.S. District Judge William Zloch in Fort Lauderdale.

Like this suit, stated John Pacenti in Law.com, “nearly all of the lawsuits involve adjustable rate subprime mortgages to high-risk customers. Ingrassia said some of his clients were offered ‘teaser rates’ as low as 1.5 percent that adjusted up within 30 days. The lawsuits also allege Calabasas, Calif.-based Countrywide and the other lenders falsified paperwork that exaggerated the income of the customers to qualify for the loan.”

While the Charlotte, N.C.-based Countrywide was purchased by Bank of America last week in a $4 billion stock deal, the bank had no comment on pending litigation against Countrywide. In Bennett’s case, her attorney, Ingrassia, is seeking rescission of her mortgages as well as damages including reimbursement of all mortgage payments, finance charges, interest, attorney fees and costs.

In short, Ingrassia doesn’t play and neither should anyone who finds themselves victimized by their lenders. According to Ingrassia, the lender violated Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and the federal Truth in Lending and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

Â

Â

Â

Â

Â

¼/p>

Popularity: 6% [?]

This post was written by:

Megan Rellahan - who has written 29 posts on Legal Research Center.


Contact the author

4 Comments For This Post

  1. Lauren Gray says:

    Um… perhaps you meant “dog eat dog”?

  2. dimitri says:

    I’m waiting on the sidelines until these go to foreclosure so I can pick them up cheap.

  3. Megan Rellahan says:

    Dear Lauren,

    Thanks so much for writing in! We love hearing from you. True on the dog-eat-dog phrase but in this particular case, I threw in a hip-hop reference, which turned dog-eat-dog into “doggy dog” after Snoop Dogg. Written all in fun! Funny…obviously not but I tried. Hey, please continue to visit our site.

    Thanks again,

    Megan

  4. Alex says:

    :)

Leave a Reply